Question
Report Sheet 10: Factors Affecting the Rate of a Chemical ReactionRecord the stock molarities of oxalic acid and potassium permanganate.Effect of concentration — run three trials and record elapsed time:- Experiment 1: 6 drops water, 5 drops H2C2O4, 1 drop KMnO4.- Experiment 2: 1 drop water, 10 drops H2C2O4, 1 drop KMnO4.- Experiment 3: 5 drops water, 5 drops H2C2O4, 2 drops KMnO4.Effect of temperature — use 6 drops water, 5 drops H2C2O4, and 1 drop KMnO4 for three trials at each condition:- room temperature;- 10–12 °C above room temperature;- 20–22 °C above room temperature;- 30–32 °C above room temperature.For each condition:1. Calculate the mean elapsed time.2. Calculate the initial KMnO4 concentration using C1V1 = C2V2.3. Calculate average rate as [KMnO4]initial divided by mean elapsed time.Discussion1. Compare experiments 1 and 2: identify the reactant changed, its concentration factor, the controls, the observed rate effect, and whether the result matches the expectation.2. Compare experiments 1 and 3 in the same way.3. Estimate the time for 1.5 drops KMnO4 and 5 drops H2C2O4 with water adjusted to 12 total drops; explain the estimate.4. Describe the effect of increasing temperature and test the “rate doubles for each 10 °C” rule against the results.5. Estimate the rate 10 °C below room temperature and state whether the elapsed time should be longer or shorter.
Answers
1. Enter the observations before calculating
The report sheet requires the stock molarities of oxalic acid and potassium permanganate, three elapsed-time trials for each concentration experiment, and three trials at each temperature. These values are not printed on the sheet. Record them from the reagent labels and your experiment.
For every row, calculate the mean time:
2. Initial permanganate concentration
All mixtures contain 12 drops, so the dilution relation is:
| Condition | Water drops | H2C2O4 drops | KMnO4 drops | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration experiment 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | |
| Concentration experiment 2 | 1 | 10 | 1 | |
| Concentration experiment 3 | 5 | 5 | 2 | |
| Every temperature run | 6 | 5 | 1 |
The report's operational average rate is:
Its units are . Substitute the labeled stock concentration and your measured mean time into each row.
3. Discussion: effect of concentration
Experiments 1 and 2: oxalic acid increases from 5 to 10 drops in the same 12-drop total volume, so its initial concentration doubles. KMnO4 and temperature are held constant. The expected trend is a higher rate and shorter endpoint time in experiment 2. Whether the rate exactly doubles must be decided from the calculated rates, not assumed.
Experiments 1 and 3: KMnO4 increases from 1 to 2 drops in the same total volume, so its initial concentration doubles. Oxalic acid and temperature are held constant. The calculated operational rate is expected to increase, but the endpoint time is not guaranteed to halve because both the initial amount of purple permanganate and the reaction rate change. Use the measured times.
The 1.5-drop prediction: keep oxalic acid at 5 drops and use 5.5 drops of water so the total remains 12 drops. Then:
Estimate the elapsed time by interpolating between experiments 1 and 3 only if their observed trend is smooth. The protocol alone does not supply a unique number.
4. Discussion: effect of temperature
The reactant proportions stay at 6 drops water, 5 drops H2C2O4, and 1 drop KMnO4. As temperature rises, the expected rate increases and the elapsed time decreases because a larger fraction of collisions have enough energy to cross the activation barrier.
The handout's “rate doubles for each 10 °C increase” is a rule of thumb, not a universal law. Test it by comparing measured rate ratios for temperature pairs about 10 °C apart:
If the rate at an ice-bath temperature 10 °C below room temperature is estimated with that rule, use approximately half the room-temperature rate. With the same initial permanganate concentration, the estimated endpoint time would be about twice as long. Label this as a model-based estimate rather than an observation.
Conclusion
The sheet fixes the dilution factors and comparison design, but the numerical rates and conclusions about how closely the data follow a doubling model depend on the student's stock concentrations and elapsed times.
Evidence boundary
The reagent proportions, dilution factors, rate equation, controlled-variable comparisons, and qualitative kinetic predictions come from the supplied report. Stock molarities, temperatures, trial times, numerical rates, and agreement with the doubling rule require the student's own data.
Sources
These references support the concepts and methods used in the explanation above.